Objective The present study focus on the macular branch retinal vein occlusion (MBRVO) with and without laser treatment,and evaluate prospectively whether laser treatment is useful in improving the visual acuity and reducing the macular edema. At the same time to learn the difference of macular light sensitivity before and after laser treatment.Methods Forty-five eyes of forty-five patients with MBRVO and macular edema were randomized to laser treatment and no laser treatment. Follow up examinations were performed every 3 months. We compared the difference of visual improvement, resolution of macular edema between the two groups. The central 30°visual field of 20 patients with MBRVO were examined at pretreatment and 3 months after laser treatment. A comparison of light sensitivity at fovea ，central 10°and 11~30°eccentricity were done between before and after laser treatment. Results Comparison of visual improvement and resolution of macular edema showed a statistical difference between laser treatment and no laser treatment. The mean reduction of macular light sensitivity at the fovea and 11~30°3 months after the treatment has no statistical difference between before and after treatment (Pgt;0.05). But the mean light sensitivity at central 10°eccentricity were significantly decreased 3 months after photocoagulation (Plt;0.05).Conclusion The laser treatment might promote or accelerate visual acuity recovery and reduce the macular edema. There is no significant difference about the efficiency on macular function after laser treatment.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：201-268)
Objective To evaluate the single-use of laser photocoagulation (LP) and the combined-use of laser photocoagulation plus intravitreal triamcinolone (LP+IVTA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) in terms of clinical therapeutic effect and safety. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang Data were searched from the date of their establishment to September 2011, and the references of all included studies were also traced, so as to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on LP vs. LP+IVTA for DME. The quality assessment and data extraction were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook 5.0 by two reviewers independently, and then Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Ten RCTs involving 525 ill eyes were included, and all of them were classified as Grade B in methodological quality. Results of meta-analysis showed that: at the end of follow-up, there were significant differences between the LP+IVTA group and the LP group in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (RR=–0.14, 95%CI –0.20 to –0.08, Plt;0.000 01), and the central macular thickness (CMT) (RR=–56.78, 95%CI –84.03 to –29.54, Plt;0.000 1). In comparison with the LP group, there were more people in the LP+IVTA group who needed to be treated for their elevated intraocular pressure and to have surgery for the progression of cataract. But no significant difference was found between the two groups in vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, retinal vein occlusion and macular epiretinal membrane. Conclusion Current evidence of clinical research shows that the LP+IVTA is superior to LP in reducing macular edema and improving vision in the treatment of diabetic macular edema, but it may also result in a high incidence of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract. Because the methodological quality limitation of included studies may affect the authenticity of outcomes, this conclusion has to be further proved by more high-quality and large-scale clinical trials.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of Fufang Xueshuantong combined with laser photocoagulation versus laser photocoagulation alone in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR). MethodThe Web of Science, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP and Wanfang databases were searched from their establishment until June 2015. We used the method recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. RevMan 5.2 software was used for the analysis. ResultsEight studies were included. The results of Meta-analysis demonstrated that Fufang Xueshuantong combined with laser photocoagulation was superior to laser photocoagulation alone in the effective rate of visual acuity[RR=1.19, 95%CI (1.12, 1.26), P<0.000 01], fundus[RR=1.34, 95%CI (1.18, 1.52), P<0.000 01], and elimination rate of macular edema[RR=1.29,95%CI(1.09,1.54),P=0.004]. ConclusionsFufang Xueshuantong combined with laser photocoagulation is effective for DR. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the results suggest that larger-scale trials are needed.
Fundus disease is a kind of common ophthalmic disease with high blindness rate and great harm. Although great breakthroughs have been made in medical treatment, laser photocoagulation, radiotherapy and gene therapy of fundus disease, with the further understanding of the essence of fundus disease, there are higher requirements for the treatment of fundus disease. To strengthen scientific research on the etiology, pathological mechanism and clinical treatment of fundus diseases, to control the quality of research, to develop reasonable treatment plans and explore new treatment methods under the guidance of evidence-based medicine theory, to further improve the level of medical treatment and benefit patients with fundus diseases will still be a formidable challenge in the future.
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a common macular disease, mainly manifested as a plasma detachment of the macula. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for CSC, but with the shortage of the photosensitizer Verteporfin, the effective treatment of CSC has become a common concern for ophthalmologists. In this paper, based on the latest research results on the relationship between the changes in the thickness of the outer nuclear layer and the natural course of the disease and PDT therapy, we propose that patients with CSC should receive effective treatment as early as possible to prevent irreversible damage to visual function due to the thinning of the outer nuclear layer. In addition to PDT, it is recommended that laser photocoagulation or subthreshold micropulse laser treatment of the leaking spot should be considered first, depending on the presence of the leaking spot and its location in relation to the macula center. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy can be considered if there is a combination of choroidal neovascularization and/or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Other treatments that have not been demonstrated to be effective in evidence-based medicine are not recommended.
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a closely related disease of ophthalmology and systemic diseases. The Expert consensus on clinical diagnosis and treatment path of retinal vein occlusion in China (consensus) emphasizes that etiological diagnosis and treatment should be paid primary attention to, and etiological exploration should be placed in an important position in the diagnosis and treatment path. In addition to etiological treatment, the consensus emphasizes that clinical attention should be paid to the management of anterior segment neovascularization, neovascular glaucoma and macular edema. Especially for patients with short course of central retinal vein occlusion, the occurrence of 100-day glaucoma should be vigilant, and active anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, laser photocoagulation and intraocular pressure treatment should be taken. For the treatment of macular edema, the consensus points out that anti-VEGF drugs and intraocular glucocorticoid sustained-release agents are effective, but the latter should be used cautiously to avoid problems such as high intraocular pressure glaucoma and accelerated cataract formation. For deficient RVO, the consensus defines its concept, defines the time point of treatment when combined with macular edema, and clarifies the applicable conditions of laser therapy.